On 03/29/2016 08:28 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > It kind of depends on how you're counting. If we're going from the > ideal target, it's, like, 5 weeks. If we go from the initial proposed > schedule, that's been adjusted by 3 weeks. If you go by that adjusted > schedule set before alpha, there's been no additional delays due to the > alpha process itself. I'm counting from the schedule initially set for Fedora 24, which had the alpha released mid-February. I'm expecting all of our release announcements to be read by folks who view them through a less nuanced lens than somebody hip-deep in the process. A good rule of thumb for this kind of thing - if you have to justify or explain something, it's wrong and should be taken out. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List info or to change your subscription: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
