On Dec 15, 2015 03:33, "Gabriele Trombini" <g.trombini@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello Remy (and all mktg guys),
>
> Il giorno mar, 15/12/2015 alle 02.41 -0500, Remy DeCausemaker ha
> scritto:
> > mktgs,
> >
> > Across the Project, one of the tools we use to get better at what
> > wedo
> > is a Retrospective. This is a report compiled by contributors that
> > more or less lists the things that went well/not-so-well, and ideas
> > for improvement. You can find examples on the wiki (QA has some
> > recent
> > pages like https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_QA_Retrospective
> > and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Retrospective)
> >
> > Marketing Retrospectives were once based upon SOPs (Standard
> > Operating
> > Procedures) for doing marketing tasks like creating the
> > alpha/beta/final
> > announcements, briefing ambassadors, and other interesting and
> > crucial
> > work. Some are a bit dated, but you can find them here:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Marketing_SOPs
>
> Yes, that's right, in particular the SOP page for retrospective is [1]
> and I would have done the retrospective, but really was busy so I miss
> the date, but thank you for heading this up.
> As the F23 mktg tasks shows [2], it was due in November. I'm going to
> open a mktg ticket for regain the time lost, and work on it soon (in
> fact we have a bit of time before before a new F24 task happens).
>
>
> > Since we didn't totally stick to an SOP for releases this year, we're
> > just going to gather extra 'after the fact' feedback and data to make
> > improvements to our process, going back to Fedora 22 when possible.
> >
> > Here are a few questions we'd like to take a stab at answering on our
> > wiki page:
> >
> > - What did we do right?
> > - What can we do better?
> > - Where did we have gaps?
> > - How did we bridge them?
> >
> > After we've gotten this retrospective fleshed out, we'd like to
> > reinstate regular mktg meetings on IRC in early 2016. Keep an eye on
> > the lists for updates.
>
> Agreed, I had the same thought. Honestly I'd like to clarify some
> questions inside the mktg just like how many of us are working on
> magazine and how many on tasks?
> I'd like shooting mails to mktg people joined the FAS group asking for
> a better engagement along the tasks time. It is not possible the "usual
> suspects" are the only members working on.
>
> >
> > If folks have any questions about this email, or additional questions
> > they think would provide value to the retrospective, please update
> > the
> > wiki before Friday 12/18 (or even just respond here, and commops will
> > update the wiki from this thread.)
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/2015_marketing_retrospective
> >
>
> We have a mktg page [3] reporting the main links to the pages, it
> renews automatically every cycle, so the new pages should be opened
> following those red links.
> Wiki is really messed up and mktg part probably more than others, and
> we should try to get it tidy.
>
> Thank you very much.
Thank YOU mailga. I checked to see when the last meeting block was, and you were def in the logs on the last entry.
Glad to see you're still here too :)
Looking Forward,
--RemyD.
>
> Gabri
>
> > [snip]
>
> [1]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing_retrospective_SOP
> [2]
> https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-23/f-23-marketing-tasks.html
> [3]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing#Release_deliverables
> >
> --
> marketing mailing list
> marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> List info or to change your subscription:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
-- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List info or to change your subscription: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
