On 11/11/2015 10:34 AM, Ryan Lerch
wrote:
Also, have a look at this tweet:On 11/11/2015 10:03 AM, Chaoyi Zha wrote:
This is incorrect -- try crafting a new tweet on twitter.com with 115 characters, then add a link with more that 25 characters -- it will let you post it. All links on twitter go through the t.co link shortener.Hi Ryan,
I think the use of a link shortener is adequate for Twitter. This is because they have a character limit, and using a shortener greatly helps increase the amount of text you can have in a tweet. Twitter counts your link's characters even though it passes it through its own link gateway.
cheers,
ryanlerch
Cheers,Chaoyi
Hi all,
Just wondering what people think about not using any link shorteners on
the official Fedora twitter feed. Twitter actually passes all links in
tweets through their own t.co/ link shortener, so using another one is
just (IMHO) unnecessarily obfuscating the link from our followers on
twitter. (twitter presents all t.co links as the full text, but the link
itself is t.co)
Looking back through the feed, the main link shortener being used is
ow.ly, which i assume is being done by whoever is using Hootsuite.
cheers,
ryanlerch
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List info or to change your subscription:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
https://twitter.com/fedora/status/664172103525146624
If you inspect the link in that tweet, (or copy the link address to see the href of it), you will see that the link is actaully t.co. So these links are passing through t.co, then redundantly redirecting on to ow.ly, then on to the actual site we want.
cheers,
ryanlerch
-- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List info or to change your subscription: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
