On 10/16/2015 02:55 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > What do other folks think? I think 30 days is a bit aggressive. There are also a number of articles where a reply after even a year might be useful (e.g. - an article about Technology Foo is high in Google Ranking and the piece is outdated and better information lives elsewhere now, thus a commenter wants to ensure other folks have some idea what is currently true). No, I wouldn't expect a reply from an author a long time after a piece is published - but that doesn't *necessarily* mean comments will no longer have value. Older pieces can be a major target for spam, so if this is something we need to do in order to retain sanity from moderating spam, then I'd be reluctantly +1. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List info or to change your subscription: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
