Hi Ryan! On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 10:14 +1000, Ryan Lerch wrote: > Thanks! > > I saw it in the pending queue this morning. > > I just added a little bit to the front of the article to explain the > issue a bit more. Thanks - that certainly improves the post :) > > One thing that might be good to add to it would be maybe a link to > the mailing list post / wiki article that explains the decision to > not mass rebuild. That might be of use to our more curious readers. > However, i couldnt find the mailing list post or wiki article (if it > exists, i dont know :) ) I did find something, but I'm not too sure if it's worth including: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1349 https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Fedora-22-No-Mass -Rebuild I think it's too much detail and will require us to explain the fesco ticket and things. I think saying "there just wasn't time on the schedule" is better, especially since the target audience here is the end-user. What do you think? > > Moved it back to draft status for you to double check my changes -- > feel free to remove them if you want :) > > this post is probably good to be posted after the release > announcement goes out too IMHO. I've moved the post back to the review queue. Do we have a wp-scheduler thing? You could just mark it to be published later, maybe a few hours after the release, and forget about it :) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List info or to change your subscription: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
