Re: Bad security rating for Fedora store

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Bad security rating for Fedora store
From: Ruth Suehle <rsuehle@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 07:28:34 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-to: marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20150214090923.GA8938@genius.invalid>
References: <20150213213440.GC15006@genius.invalid> <CAJEvJL9Nw774m1+_FcdNeDfMNkzCvbXZGXdx6XMXLZTbtecKpQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150214090923.GA8938@genius.invalid>
Thread-index: zOnZV8AZntQJU0OI7U4OFUq921Cveg==
Thread-topic: Bad security rating for Fedora store

I've forwarded it on. 
-- 
marketing mailing list
marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List info or to change your subscription:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bad security rating for Fedora store
  - From: Till Maas

References:
- Bad security rating for Fedora store
  - From: Till Maas
- Re: Bad security rating for Fedora store
  - From: beta tester
- Re: Bad security rating for Fedora store
  - From: Till Maas

Prev by Date: Re: Bad security rating for Fedora store
Next by Date: Re: Bad security rating for Fedora store
Previous by thread: Re: Bad security rating for Fedora store
Next by thread: Re: Bad security rating for Fedora store
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Mentors] [Kernel Developers] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Gimp Users] [Yosemite Camping]

Powered by Linux