> IIRC the decision to hold back on the CC-BY-SA licensing was due to the planet inclusion, in the event someone reblogged something that was written as all rights reserved.
Obviously that won't be an issue if all of our articles are new content
-Bryan
If I remember properly, the reason we didn't go with a blanket license
was to give ourselves more latitude in running content from independent
writers or other sources where CC-BY-SA (or whatever) might not fit
their needs.
> There may also be a Fedora-wide contribution policy, and we also don't
> want to contradict that.
There is, although to date I don't think we've mandated that magazine
contributors agree to it. We probably _should_.
was to give ourselves more latitude in running content from independent
writers or other sources where CC-BY-SA (or whatever) might not fit
their needs.
> There may also be a Fedora-wide contribution policy, and we also don't
> want to contradict that.
There is, although to date I don't think we've mandated that magazine
contributors agree to it. We probably _should_.
-- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List info or to change your subscription: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
