On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:58:44PM -0600, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > One thing I have noticed - we don't have a "place" for Fedora Docker > images. Since they were taken on by the base WG, they have sort of been > orphaned under products. Do they belong under Server? Cloud? Spins? It'd be nice to have a little blurb on the web page linking to the docker hub, I guess. > The Fedora Cloud Working Group offers two variants for different use > cases. The Base image is suitable for anyone who wants to run Fedora in > the AWS public cloud, or on a private cloud like OpenStack. > The Fedora Atomic Host is generated using rpm-ostree to allow true > "atomic" updates, and is optimized to run Docker containers. > Both are available in formats suitable for public or private clouds. Iterating on this a little bit... If you want a solid yet flexible minimal image on which you can build whatever you like, choose **Fedora Cloud Base** to run in the AWS EC2 public cloud or in a private cloud like OpenStack. If you want to try our next-generation solution for running Docker containers on top of an optimized system with true "atomic" updates, check out **Fedora Atomic Host**. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List info or to change your subscription: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
