----- Original Message ----- > ----- Original Message ----- > > Traditionally, part of the Fedora election process has been a wiki page > > where anyone edits in questions and candidates edit in answers. The last > > few > > elections, this hasn't worked very well. Jaroslav suggested > > <https://fedorahosted.org/board/ticket/14> that we replace this with > > interviews run in the magazine instead. Sounds great to me -- what do you > > all think? > > I think it sounds like a good idea as well. What's the time frame we're > looking at? There's one catch - traditionally we had only one week for questionnaires in the schedule and I'm not sure how manageable it is for interviews to get answers on time and Fedora magazine to spam it with interviews in that really short time (unless all interviews are in the same post and it would limit visibility). I think the answer would be in pre-prepared questions - same for all candidates, skipping submission of questions in advance and start interview right after we have first candidate on the list even within nomination period and ask community to ask questions in magazine posts comments (and tell candidates to answer there). Top questions could be then added as addendum to the post. I really like to avoid prolonging schedule as it means - wait for appointees, elections takes one month already... On the other hand, I'd really like to avoid muting community. But history shows, not many people asked questions (hidden somewhere on Wiki) and we will have comments, we will have townhalls, interviews... Any suggestions? Jaroslav > -- > marketing mailing list > marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
