----- Original Message ----- > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/10/2014 09:54 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > > Matthew Miller píše v Čt 10. 04. 2014 v 10:11 -0400: > >> This is probably old hat to some of the social media experts > >> here, but I found it enlightening, especially in light of recent > >> comments about our presence there. > >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9ZqXlHl65g> > >> > >> It certainly mirrors my experience with the Facebook group -- > >> lots of members, but very low engagement. > > Just FYI we have three points of presence on FB (at least): > > The Facebook *Group*: https://www.facebook.com/groups/Fedora.linux/ > The Facebook Fedora Community Folks *group*: > https://www.facebook.com/groups/127560783969535/ > And the Fedora Linux *Page*: https://www.facebook.com/TheFedoraProject > > This is, IMHO, confusing - so let's be sure we're talking about the > same things. Yes, it is confusing. On the other hand, it can be used for good. Especially that Community folks vs rest. When I share important milestones on FB, I do it only in the community folks group. There's not need to confuse users, I really want to reach different target audience. On the other hand, with more generic posts, I always struggle where to post... And for people looking for Fedora presence on FB it can be really confusing which one they should pick up. But as you know, I usually like more options with a good explanation. Maybe changing "about" messages for all these groups/pages could help. R. -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
