-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/30/2014 10:00 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > The Fedora - Linux Facebook group is set to require administrative > approval for all new members. This results in a lot of busywork, > because while there are a few clearly fake profiles and so on, it's > a few dozen legit people every day. > > Would it be a horrible thing if we set this to an open membership > policy? We could continue to require administrative approval for > posts. Or was there a horrible spam problem? So, AFAICT, there's no way to moderate user comments - just moderate users before they join. So my concern here is that we're going to let in a horde of spammers and spend a lot of time cleaning up after them. (It'll be harder to tell what posts the spam / malicious profiles decide to comment on than it is to filter out potentially malicious users up-front, is what I'm saying.) That'd be my only concern. If there's a way to moderate or even see roughly in order the new comments to look for spam, then throwing open the floodgates would make sense. Best, jzb - -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTOOwhAAoJEKbW5zOgIHzU1UIH/1M5p2Kc1ElTqheLjXWJf6pu gYKn0Ggm2o5XBSDQU86AMqGJCPxnFIrC0FNh35yZGDMPcqmx8u7w01x8tbV+zMu8 kiOCsh9KfUYxUWqhyTBTZdF5K3/+aRPOELF7fLogrRJFougAHcF1bFOVDMWWYSD/ aAQF97tPc5G7Ew+jCCpygWyhKXgFrmf/rRvpTlm+shnyNGB+iXUOPZ0/bzKPtnPe R5U66pacVp6cVRnptW7++xcsBNJsVDrsi7NJqRSoGLcPM8baBle9eBqKg4z/XbIo b8cRKbE4ojZ5Jug2T7IypFIOcLFI7gTqK4z4eTgLJFve7lOLQ4rzO9yTV/WAIsE= =H7m4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
