----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joe Brockmeier" <jzb@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Robyn Bergeron" <rbergero@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Fedora Marketing team" <marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 11:01:01 AM > Subject: Re: Copyright Submission Proposal > > On 03/26/2014 12:55 PM, Robyn Bergeron wrote: > > #2: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 is listed in > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing as a license that isn't > > acceptable for Fedora. I realize you're citing 4.0 here, and we don't > > have guidance on 4.0 in the wiki, but I have to imagine it's not going > > to be much of a change. The NC part is still NC... as you said, it's the > > most restrictive, and at least in my opinion, restrictiveness isn't > > exactly freedom-enabling :) > > Yeah, my bad. > > I have my reasons for preferring the NC, myself, but as I said - I'll go > along with whatever the project/group prefer. > > My main point is we should have one CC license content is published > under, and authors should know and agree to that when they put stuff on > the magazine. > > As for the magazine being hooked up to FAS - have we been checking that > all submissions come from people who've signed the FPCA? It's not > automated. I guess the question I'm asking (to be more clear): If I get access to publish something to the Magazine, how is that access granted? Am I added to a FAS group, which in turn provides permissions for access? Or is the addition to the magazine author/editor list done manually? > > Best, > > jzb > -- > Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst > jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ > Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ > -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
