On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rbergero@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I would *personally* prefer the most restrictive of the CC licenses (CC
> BY-NC-ND 4.0):
>
> https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
#2: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 is listed in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing as a license that isn't acceptable for Fedora. I realize you're citing 4.0 here, and we don't have guidance on 4.0 in the wiki, but I have to imagine it's not going to be much of a change. The NC part is still NC... as you said, it's the most restrictive, and at least in my opinion, restrictiveness isn't exactly freedom-enabling :)
As mentioned on the marketing list earlier, the Red Hat legal team wrote terms of use for us, which croberts thinks must have gotten deleted in a migration/upgrade. But they specify Creative
Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License ("CC-BY-SA").
Ruth
-- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
