On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 05:55:24PM -0500, Ruth Suehle wrote: > - I'm still concerned about the Red Hat point of view on using the word > "products" for Fedora things. I haven't heard anything officially from anyone about this concern. This word doesn't necessarily have to be used in marketing, and we can avoid it if need be. However, I do think it's an important word that is hard to replace, from an internal-to-Fedora messaging point of view. We are talking about artifacts that we _produce_ intentionally. I don't think that there's any real possibility of confusion that we are suddenly going to up and start trying to sell these things, but it's nice to talk about a process that _makes certain things_. > - We are already understaffed, so to speak, as a marketing team. We may be > able to sort-of serve three things, but if we're going to be adding > anything that someone "can pull off," we just won't be equally serving > everyone. So, for the "shows required resources" camp, that could simply mean that those resources need to include more help for this team too. -- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
