|
We wouldn't use all 16 gears all the time,if we make a scalable app, Openshift will scale new gears in our app as we need them (because of the load) and remove them when we don't need them. Anyway I think that asking from Openshift that, or if we can't "ask" it like you said, and see if we can have some bugdet for this(which doesn't make any sense for me, but anyway), it would be very easy to solve our problem permanently.
The only alternative I can think of is hosting it in our own servers... Thoughts? -Zacharias > Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:59:49 -0600 > From: jzb@redhat.com > To: marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Fedora Magazine down again > > On 12/17/2013 03:44 PM, Zacharias Mitzelos wrote: > > We currently don't have scalability in Openshift. That could be done by > > migrating to a new gear, which could also be a medium one(i have > > encountered some errors during thr migration, although lsm5 opened me a > > ticket about that in the openshift support, but noone reached me out yet). > > Have you followed up? This has been waiting for a while. > > > Anyway we are using one gear to our account now. Jzb is it possible to > > upgrade our acc. to large gears and give us the privileges of a silver > > account(16 gears available)? If I am asking too much (:P) medium gears > > that we already have will be fine, but we definitely need scalability up > > to 16(instead of 3 that we are eligible for), so we could handle such > > traffic. With 16 gears available to scale + large gears we could even > > handle the thehackernews traffic you said ;). > > I don't know that asking for 16 gears would be considered reasonable. > Three? Sure. 16... uh, not so sure. > > > Anyway this is just an opinion, I may got very far with it, but I would > > suggest keeping Openshift because of GIT > > Please elaborate? What does git have to do with anything? > > Note that Middleman is also git-based and doesn't require a lot of gears > to work well. > > Sidebar: It's *possible* there may be a third option, but I need to do a > little more research before saying whether it's viable or not. > > Again, though: I want to stress, please accompany any alternative > solutions with "and here's how I will take responsibility to make it > happen." ;-) I want to get this fixed, and in the immediate future. > > > Zacharias > > > >> From: giallu@gmail.com > >> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 22:03:24 +0100 > >> Subject: Re: Fedora Magazine down again > >> To: jzb@redhat.com; marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> > >> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> So - the release went out this morning, and shortly thereafter the > >>> traffic to the blog post knocked out the site. > >>> > >>> We've been talking a lot about re-doing the theme (which died) and > >>> upgrading, which has also stalled. I'm not really confident that > >>> upgrading to the medium gear is going to compensate anyway - we *should* > >>> see big traffic bursts from time to time due to releases, popular posts, > >>> etc. and WP is a bit resource intensive. > >> > >> I think one of the selling point of openshift was it gives you an easy > >> access to scalabilty. Is the blog using anything like that? > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Gianluca Sforna > >> > >> http://morefedora.blogspot.com > >> http://identi.ca/giallu - http://twitter.com/giallu > >> -- > >> marketing mailing list > >> marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst > jzb@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ > Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ > -- > marketing mailing list > marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing |
-- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
