On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:49:37AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 01:31:23AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > Not sure voting is necessary - if someone is taking point on this, we > > should empower them to run with it, IMHO. (And if there's 2+ excellent > > posts, why limit things? Re-running all of Planet would be excessive, > > but if we find N+1 great posts in a week and the authors are OK with > > reposts, then cool by me.) > > Honestly, I don't think it'd hurt to rerun all of the > directly-Fedora-relevant content from the planet. Possibly this could even > be done automatically for people who agree to it and who agree to follow > certain rules? I stopped following it regularly because of the amount of > non-Fedora content, which is kind of a shame because there _is_ a lot of > great Fedora activity that I'm missing. Might wind up with quite a lot of content hitting the site that way. Might, not sure. But I think we're all agreed: Running some posts from Planet with assent from the authors is a good thing. (Yes?) We can start small and work our way up, I think. Is someone prepped to run with that? Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
