On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:28:08AM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > Well, it's what FESCo asked for to be more dogmatic :). The only thing I'd like > to avoid is more confusion when we have. I think current version makes sense. > Also I remember marketing team was talking about "shines". But yeah, I'm > silent now :). Sorry, "shines"? Can you clarify that? For the alpha release, I took a pretty dry/straightforward approach for the most part because the alpha audience is smaller and a little more technical (I think) than the audience for the final announcement. > Btw., could you please take a look on the sendmail/rsyslog section to clarify > it a bit more - randomuser raised that question how clear/correct it is on > docs meeting. Happy to take corrections if needed. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing