----- Original Message ----- > > ----- "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Since the FPL has appointed three of those seats to volunteers and > > only one to someone who's a Red Hat employee, I'm not sure how this > > is > > relevant. Looking at the Board history for those seats[1] one can > > see > > half the appointments since mid-2008 have been volunteers. Also of > > note is the fact that half the people elected by the community > > since > > that time have also been volunteers. So the appointments don't > > look > > slanted toward Red Hat employees AFAICT, which is just as intended. > > > > We can agree to disagree on your overall point, that's fine. I > > just > > wanted to point out the facts don't support an effort to stack the > > Board with Red Hat people. > > > > * * * > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/History > > > > How about the bigger question, what percentage of FESCo has been Red > Hat employees during any term. How many ran for elections and got voted... > After all it is FESCo that really > matters what is in Fedora, not the board. More than to other Fedora bodies as FESCo is engineering committee and Red Hatters in Fedora are mostly engineers. Makes sense :) You see less in Board and even less in FAmSCo... Jaroslav > I would track this out > myself but the use of non@redhat email addresses makes it hard, even > asking the candidates in Election town halls you get the run around > commonly. "Who I work for doesn't matter." How many times have we > heard that? > > -- Bob > -- > marketing mailing list > marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
