Krzysztof Hajdamowicz píše v Ne 20. 05. 2012 v 20:22 +0200: > > 20 maj 2012 02:44, "Davi Garcia" <davigarcia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > napisał(a): > > > > Hi all, > > > > On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Jason Brooks > > <jasonbrooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > In a brief ZDNet review, Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols offers faint > praise > > > for Fedora 17: > > > > "That said, I did find this new Fedora with GNOME to be usable. I > have > > to say I didn’t find the last version to be at all useful. Still, > I’m > > left wondering why Fedora and GNOME first went in such a mis-guided > > direction in the first place. It’s great that Fedora and GNOME are > > much better than they were, but they’re still not for me, anyway, as > > useful as the last Fedora with GNOME 2.x was. I can see that Fedora > is > > better, but I’m going to be sticking with Linux Mint, Ubuntu, and > > openSUSE for my daily desktop use." > > > > To tell you the truth, I don't understand what people see of too bad > > in Gnome 3.X. I confess that I had some difficult at the beginning, > > but after some days, I loved it! Gnome 3 is the redefinition of the > > concept of desktop enviroment. Maybe people be just afraid of the > > change... > > > > To be honest, I've moved from Fedora 16 with GNOME 3 into Ubuntu with > Unity environment and I'm amazed. Ubuntu eats less RAM, gives better > battery consumption results and most important: Unity made me more > productive. > And yes, I liked GNOME 3 and I feel native in it Well, I know about tens of users that have left Unity for either GNOME 3 in Ubuntu or another distribution for two reasons: Unity is slow (which really is) and not productive. Some of them were power users. In my experience, most people that have equally tried both Unity and GNOME 3 like GNOME 3 more. But there is no generally better environment. Everyone can pick what he likes. Jiri -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
