On 05/09/2012 03:16 AM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote: > ----- "Danishka Navin" <danishka@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:06 AM, inode0 < inode0@xxxxxxxxx > wrote: >> >> If it is confused with other logos from a similar product space then >> it isn't perfect. It may well be no fault of the logo but it is a >> problem. >> >> If a lot of someones think it is related to Facebook then it is a >> problem worth thinking about before it gets completely out of control. >> We have seen other hints that this confusion exists in the past as >> well. >> >> Admitting we have a brand problem which seems to be related to some >> similar aspects that exist in our logo and in Facebook's logo doesn't >> mean we need to abandon our logo. Are there other ways available to us >> to mitigate this confusion? Perhaps advertising Fedora more widely so >> more people are exposed to our brand more often? Perhaps something >> else? >> >> it would be great if we could identify the region/location of those >> people. >> but there is no such information i guess. >> >> I think we should increase our presence in the social media specially >> in Facebook itself. >> > Maybe it's something that Red Hat legal should have handled years ago and didn't? > > -- Bob Fedora Logo has a long established base, and changing the logo would not be a good decision in my opinion. -- Abhishek Singh FOSS Nepal Community http://wiki.fossnepal.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
