On 04/15/2011 05:43 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 04/15/2011 08:08 PM, Aleksandra Bookwar wrote: >> Yes, this package has its problems, and i don't expect all of them to >> be solved before release date. But there is still time to improve it >> before release, and there are people who work on this improvement. All >> they need is some respect and attention from "authorities" and a >> little bit of help from Gnome developers. > > Have you talked to GNOME Tweak tool maintainer to see if he finds the > idea of the tool being installed by default appealing? The problem with > pushing such things into the default package set is not merely the > fragility or bugs in the tools themselves but the fact that these expose > options that haven't been tested well if at all. Again, do take a > look at bugzilla to see what I am talking about. We are well past the > beta release point to be advocating for these sort of changes. I remain > opposed to pretty much any change other than bug fixes at this point. Then maybe we should revert Fedora 15 to some sane, less buggy, solution as a default? -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/ -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
