Re: [in the news] New Legal Guideline

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 14.11.2010 23:15, schrieb Jon Stanley:
> Here's the thing here. Nmap and wireshark do not *actively* exploit
> systems, 

By just ignoring them such tools will not disappear and a lot people
prefer to have them packaged according to the Fedora standards and not
just from somewhere, this is one goal that we tried to achieve with FSL
and we were not the only who had set high expections in it -

http://lwn.net/Articles/377100/

what is with dsniff, ettercap and yersinia which are clearly made to do
multiple spoofing and layer2 mitm attacks?
To do proper security test according to the most security Testing
Standards you need these tools as well

As said before - lets see with what Spot will come up after his legal
analysis.


cu Joerg
-- 
Joerg (kital) Simon
jsimon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JoergSimon
http://kitall.blogspot.com
Key Fingerprint:
3691 0989 2DCA 58A2 8D1F 2CAC C823 558E 5B5B 5688

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
marketing mailing list
marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux