I'm cool with the s/Spin/Lab/ change. As for the 'Spin' requirement in the title -- the 'Fedora Electronic Lab' exists, so I assume it's ok? luke On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 01:30:20PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > I think there might be some Trademark issue with that because as I > understand it the word "Spin" is key in the approval for use of the Fedora > name. I could be mistaken and if I am then I do agree that "Fedora Security > Lab" is a better name or possibly "Fedora Security Lab Spin" as a > compromised middle ground. > > -AdamM (From Android) > > On Jun 17, 2010 12:41 PM, "Joerg Simon" <jsimon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It was brought to me, that there was some minor confusion about the > naming of the Fedora-Security-Lab. By calling it Fedora-Security-Spin > and without reading about it´s purpose, people could interpret it as a > more secure Fedora Version - what is nonsense - it provides the same > Security Features as any other Fedora. With Feedback from Robyn i > recommend we should keep the naming more consistent and if we talk about > it - name it "Fedora Security Lab" - because "it implies more of a > toolchain / testing environment". > > I already made the necessary changes: > > edited the spins-page > http://spins.fedoraproject.org/security > > Wiki: > moved Security Spin to Security Lab > moved Marketing/presskit/securityspin to Marketing/presskit/SecurityLab > changed it in > Fedora 13 Talking Points > Marketing/presskit/SecurityLab > > thanks and cu Joerg > > > -- > Joerg (kital) Simon > jsimon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JoergSimon > http://kitall.blogspot.com > Key Fingerprint: > 3691 0989 2DCA 58A2 8D1F 2CAC C823 558E 5B5B 5688 -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
