With all the facts so nicely laid out, it definitely is worth a blog entry. I would paint it as "a day in the life of community-driven QA" and focus on the whole story. With a short sentence on how the patch we ignored caused some problems in that other distro with a link to the ubuntu leak story. That way makes sure it will get connected and indexed in the right context but readers will see that this is really just sth worth mentioning, not worth discussing. I can write it on my blog (http://jan.wildeboer.net) as google seemingly likes my blog and puts it quite high in its ranking. Jan ----- Original Message ----- From: marketing-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <marketing-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: For discussions about marketing and expanding the Fedora user base <marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tue Apr 27 20:33:58 2010 Subject: Re: Quick heads-up: Ubuntu memory leak issue On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 23:30 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > However, Ubuntu and Fedora took different approaches to fixing it. > Ubuntu seems to have jumped on one of Jesse Barnes' early attempts to > fix the problem (Jesse works for RH, hence the Red Hat link). In the Correction: Jesse in fact works for Intel. Apologies for the mistake. Thanks to Matthew Garrett for the correction. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
