I do love how the journalist starts the article on itmanagement.earthweb.com. Nelson Marques http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/evilclown.htm On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 09:04 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > So, Zarafa is getting a lot of press attention: > > http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=6298 > > some of it is fairly unflattering: > > http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/3877446/Fedora-13-Beta-The-Seen-and-Troubling-Unseen.htm > > I'm a bit uncomfortable with this myself; the availability of Zarafa in > Fedora seems to be being read in ways in which we certainly didn't > intend it (as an aspect of commercialization, as some kind of Red > Hat-parachuted feature and hence an indication of RH's future > directions, etc). > > I'm wondering if perhaps we should pull Zarafa's mention as a 'feature' > of Fedora 13, or if not that, then certainly develop a more coherent > story about its inclusion, what it's for, why it's in Fedora, and the > whole 'open core' angle on it... > > What do people think? > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org > http://www.happyassassin.net > -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
