Now I am not in the "told you so" department, but it unfolds as I expected. Not much we can do now without harming either Fedora or Zarafa. Maybe Zarafa can think of renaming the open source edition just as fedora v RHEL? Jan ----- Original Message ----- From: marketing-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <marketing-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tue Apr 20 12:04:28 2010 Subject: In the news: Zarafa So, Zarafa is getting a lot of press attention: http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=6298 some of it is fairly unflattering: http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/3877446/Fedora-13-Beta-The-Seen-and-Troubling-Unseen.htm I'm a bit uncomfortable with this myself; the availability of Zarafa in Fedora seems to be being read in ways in which we certainly didn't intend it (as an aspect of commercialization, as some kind of Red Hat-parachuted feature and hence an indication of RH's future directions, etc). I'm wondering if perhaps we should pull Zarafa's mention as a 'feature' of Fedora 13, or if not that, then certainly develop a more coherent story about its inclusion, what it's for, why it's in Fedora, and the whole 'open core' angle on it... What do people think? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
