On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 05:11:33AM +0500, Mani A wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The queue system sounds perfect to me.. I could make the tables but > > someone will please have to do the guidelines part etc.. I'm really not > > qualified enough for that.. :) > > Article Title > Source > General Remarks > Severity of Disinformation --> Very Severe/ Severe/ Medium / Low > Relevant passages (link to another local location ) > Action Required ---> > Assigned To ---> > Resolution --> This is an awful lot of weight for what should be a simple queue. If we want a ticketing system for this, that's fine too; but the more requirements that are added onto this simple listing, the less likely that people will maintain it. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
