On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 05:40:21AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 05/12/2009 05:32 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > > > I think that all Monty states is that Thusnelda is improving, and > > closing the gap to x264, before other subjective tuning measures are > > applied. I infer from his statements that he believes Thusnelda will > > at some point be as good or better than x264, but it hasn't happened > > yet according to his page: > > http://web.mit.edu/xiphmont/Public/theora/demo7.html > > This page was edited after I had submitted the story to OSNews. The > original page did have some claims about being ahead of H264 which was > found to be a miscalculation sometime after I had submitted the story. > Bad timing. No big deal, I just figured there were people reading this list who probably would be interested in his clarifications. I just read his page myself. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
