We're going to use the Fedora Project wiki for uploading photos. This ensures that people who are submitting photos have indeed signed the CLA. I discussed the alternatives with Mo and it seemed like the wiki was a good solution, and Infrastructure stated that the amount of storage space shouldn't be a problem. (I'd like if people did not submit photos until after the FUDCon ones go up, but I can't really stop people from that.) Procedures are available at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Picture_book#Submitting_your_image Let me know if you think they should be changed. I've got a watch on the page. Media in a category automatically shows up in a gallery format -- after they enter the "to be approved" category, we can move them to different categories as necessary to sort out the incoming images. I'm thinking different levels of usability, a rating from 1 to 3, one being the most usable. The nice thing about the wiki is that people who can make the photo of higher quality can do so just by reuploading a photo for that filename. We also need to appoint who is able to "approve" and sort the photos into the rating categories. Something akin to the Fedora package review process would be good -- a list of requirements, a list of people who can review, and the process goes from there. Questions, comments, flames? (And, as a final comment -- let's hold off on the production-related discussions until probably a week or two from now when we're done sorting the FUDCon photos.) -- Ian Weller <ianweller@xxxxxxxxx> http://ianweller.org GnuPG fingerprint: E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226 B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36 "Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet." ~ Douglas Adams
Attachment:
pgpGwXNKdWEEK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
