On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 21:57 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > (a) RHM editors have to do heavy cultivating of original content ... > (b)Submissions come in organicly for editorial review ... It is more like: (c) After building up some reputation and the occasional ability to pay people, article ideas are submitted. The more you have published, the likelier your idea will get attention. People who are @redhat.com who get published are more likely self-starters who think of doing it themselves. There is room to work with product managers and others to craft "write article for Magazine" in people's goals/part of their job. I would expect that part to be arranged by @redhat.com people, and I don't hear any of them trying to run away from doing that here. In fact, if we can free up more of their time by making a steady content pipeline through a joint venture, they are more likely to be able to do that. Although I'm not speaking for the RHM editors, I was on that team for the first part of this year as a sub-editor for Dev Fu and am familiar with the issues at hand. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Community Gardener Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
