Pitching Fedora to Desktop users who already want Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry for another desktop thread, but I thought this was an interesting data point. This is an interesting data point because I think it's about message and not so much about technical data.

I was talking with a user who did not want to look at Fedora or an EL on the desktop where they work for the following reasons, and was looking at using Ubuntu. Naturally knowing that really there is almost no difference in these (Gnome is Gnome) and they didn't even need the non-free codecs, I figured I would pass on the comments in hopes that this would be useful to someone else.

Their Comments:

(A) Fedora is too much of an upgrade process every six months. This is interesting to me because Ubuntu comes out at about the same rate. I did not think they were talking about LTS releases, but are we pitching the ease of things like preupgrade enough? How do we get more desktop footprint out there -- not just in home users, but also in companies where there is mindshare (and future contributors) to be won? How do we make Fedora seem less fragile even as it tries to be the "best of what works now"? It's clearly a fine desktop. Not much is required in a desktop. The whole phrase is kind of silly even as I mostly just want a web browser and an editor, and most everyone else does too :)

(B) Comments that Red Hat, not Fedora, was disinterested in the desktop -- therefore they were less interested in Fedora as they didn't see an investment. Clearly not true. I don't see this being applicable because it's a capable desktop, we invest well in it, and Fedora cares very much about this. Again, how do we pass on that message? Again, nothing technical is IMHO required, it's mostly about dispelling those statements.

In the context of fedora-marketing, I'm wondering how we can deal with this image that -- as far as I can not tell, is not descriptive of the distro.

The user in question also seemed a bit burned by Fedora 9's upgrade process, which I'll agree -- I got burned too.... something slipped in that one and it's not my job to say where, but I think that left a bit of an impression. (Namely, my grub getting removed/mangled, which is a now closed bz).

I have no inspiring conclusions but thought I'd pass on the data points.

I want to see Fedora everywhere, corporate desktops and making Microsoft go away seems to be a noble goal (it's free) with huge advantages to Fedora (huge contributer and mindshare base). Let's figure out what it takes to make that happen.

--Michael

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux