2008/7/24 Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>: > * He didn't seem to be interested in Moblin as a feature of Fedora, per > se. He's happy to work as a downstream entirely. I wasn't thinking Fedora 'feature' I was thinking more along the lines of how OLPC is interacting with us..sort of...without making use of the Fedora brand directly. Obviously they have a technical investment with OpenSuse's building service. Is there room for a technical bridge there between that service and our infrastructure? I'm not saying that we build that bridge for them. But if over time they wanted to work with us more closely, would we allow some sort of technical bridge to be built? My concern is primary about doing what is best to build contributor interest in the space that Moblin is attacking. I'm not sure they are going to get a community involvement boost acting as a complete separate downstream to our..kernel. I think they will only get a real boost if they align their internal project processes with the process of either OpenSuse or Fedora to more easily access one or the other existing contributor pools. And I think we can do that without forcing them to use the Fedora brand. We are sort of doing this with OLPC right now, aren't we? I hate to see them bouncing back and forth trying to be the downstream of different projects in succession, looking for the magic ticket that unlocks new contributor interest. -jef -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
