2008/6/17 Lucas Saboya <lucas@xxxxxxxxxx>: > Ok, but that is the point since the beginning of the project, I think.. :D I don't anyone is arguing over the point. What I trying to suggest is that being explicit concerning the licensing in the web submission form matters. It should not be implied in the submission form. People submitting videos should actively affirm the licensing so that we have a record that we were told what the copyright license on the material is. We cannot have this project taking in video into a project branded miror channel assuming the licensing is okay. The submitter must tell us explicitly what the licensing is... just like we expect people contributing code into our repository must do as part of the package submission review. John did not include a field for licensing in the list of things the webform needs. I am suggesting that the lack of a licensing field in the webform is an oversight that needs to be corrected. -jef -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
