Jeff Spaleta wrote:
2008/6/10 Clint Savage <herlo1@xxxxxxxxx>:
What are the licensing options? I've never even looked into licensing video. If it were
text,
Open Publication License would work. Does that work for video?
It's going to be one of the more liberal CC licenses, perhaps
something as liberal as CC-BY-SA. I'm going to make an arbitrary
decision for now that for the time being people experimenting with
Fedora videos license under CC-BY-SA, with an understanding that if
the acceptable licensing changes as part of on-going discussions the
video creators are willing to relicense the works accordingly.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Count me as a supporter of licensing as CC-BY-SA: it encourage others to
remix our videos and also allows us to include in our videos stuff made
by other people and licensed as CC-BY-SA.
From all the CC licenses, it seems the only viable options are CC-BY
and CC-BY-SA (the other, NC and ND are *not free*).
Using a CC license could work also as a marketing vehicle, licenses as
OPL are largely unknown, when people hear about something released under
such license will react like "whatever, that is *some* content released
under *some* license", but using CC will create more buzz.
Also, we can try a collaboration with ccLiveContent (is that project
still alive?)
--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
