On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Valent Turkovic <valent.turkovic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > http://osnews.com/story/19818/Ubuntu-8.04-vs.-Fedora-9 > > When it comes to Fedora, there were a few problems on the X.org side, > but what they loved was the support for SELinux. " Most users will > find that the biggest benefit of SELinux is its management of root > user authority: The program alerts you when you've had root privileges > activated for more than a few minutes, so you can minimize your > exposure from this vulnerability." > > -- > http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/ > linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless > registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. > ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic > Actually the conclusion is better: For users who are already familiar with Linux, Fedora 9 is an excellent choice. Robust security features and installation options make it somewhat more versatile than Ubuntu, which offers a more streamlined (and therefore more restricted) installation. For most users, though, including millions interested in trying Linux for the first time, Fedora lacks the polish and ready-to-run simplicity of its more popular rival. -- http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/ linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
