On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Absolutely. We make a pretty big effort on testing what we ship however and > that should still be recognized. . Recognized? Sure. But we *cannot* simply sit back and rest on our laurels of producing a quality distribution. Our QA right now is ""passable". It must be SUPERIOR. Working on documentation, which is lacking, in order to build a community around QA is one of my personal short-term goals. > Releasing parts of a automated testing framework without any tests to go > along with that wasn't a very useful decision. We can't build a testing > community with just that. I am still talking to folks to fix that. Stay tuned for FUDCon. -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list