Re: Top Ten Tasks For www.fedoraproject.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Personally, I think it'd almost be perfectly safe to offer just 32bit by default. It'll be almost guaranteed to run. Someone wanting 64bit will know enough to click a little bit more and find the 64bit version. Only exception to these thoughts would be the PowerPC ones which I'm not the most familiar with.

Juan Camilo Prada wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 15:04 -0500, Ian Weller wrote:
  
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Patrik Cevela wrote:

    
I think the platform identification by "i386", "x86_64" and "ppc" is incomprehensible for newbees.
It would be better call it "Desktop, 32bit version", "Desktop, 64bit" and "PowerPC".

      
Why not have both? -- ian

    

Because we want to avoid ambiguity.

the idea is to provide an easy link for the most common installation
media 

  


-- 
~Michael
http://ridleytx.structed.net (for now)
http://michaelbox.net (eventually) 
-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux