On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 20:43 +0200, JoergSimon wrote: > Am Dienstag, 1. April 2008 18:45:59 schrieb Karsten 'quaid' Wade: > > A quick discussion halt here. > > > > Joerg -- your reply was made to a related but *completely different > > discussion*. Greg's comment you quoted refers to a policy, not a > > particular action. > > Karsten, i answered direct to a Topic from Greg called > "Associating the Red Hat and Fedora brands?" > <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2008-March/msg00300.html> > He asked for opinions and in my eyes this answer was related. > I would love to explain it more eloquent, but i am not so skilled with the > english language. Maybe some of my words are to straight - sorry for that. > First off all, as private Person i have a shadowman sticker on my notebook ;-) Thanks, your arguments make sense to me and give me more to consider. Definitely I can see how having a Red Hat brand at events would make your work harder. For Fedora, we need a process to honor sponsors without confusing the brand. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
