On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 16:20 -0400, Russell Harrison wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Jonathan Roberts > <jonrob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'll try, but I'll also copy Frank to see what he thinks. > > > > * MU was a pain to get working with https, and looking through this > > thread I see Mike McGrath suggest that code changes would have been > > required, which would perhaps outweigh the plugin problems some have > > reported with Lyceum, especially when on their website they say: > > I looked a bit more into this last night. All I have to say is booooo > WordPress MU developers boo. The fix is pretty lamely easy but would > be a huge hassle to have to do every time we tried to patch to the > latest version. I'll take your research into the issues as enough to > sway me. > > +1 Lyceum > > Its nice knowing smart people are working on things. You can just > trust them to know what they're talking about. :-D OK, I see no more complaints on the Lyceum front, so does this mean everyone is happy to move forward with this? Also, I got no feedback on the best way to test our various workflows to make sure we are happy with the software and that it will work for us. If I don't hear any more, I'll come up with a plan for this sometime today or tomorrow and post it back here... Best wishes, Jon -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
