Am Montag, 31. März 2008 23:26:33 schrieb Greg DeKoenigsberg: > If, in splash screens for Fedora, we put a tasteful "sponsored by Red Hat" > with the Shadowman logo somewhere small... how would you all feel about > that? Let me answer with a mail i answered to Rahul with a reply from Paul Frields. I understand it from the RedHat view. But i don´t like this idea! cu Joerg -- Jörg Simon jsimon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JoergSimon Key Fingerprint: 3691 0989 2DCA 58A2 8D1F 2CAC C823 558E 5B5B 5688
--- Begin Message ---
- Subject: Re: [Ambassadors] Re: Co-branding?
- From: "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:10:19 -0400
- In-reply-to: <200803261155.14865.jsimon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <47E9A4C3.80708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200803261108.11954.jsimon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47EA22F9.8050809@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200803261155.14865.jsimon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 11:55 +0100, JoergSimon wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2008 11:18:33 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > > Branding is more concerned with marketing. Besides if ambassadors are > > not subscribed to the marketing list, they are not following the > > recommend procedure at > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/Join > > yes > > > We don't > > want to cross post either. Refer > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2007-March/msg00007.ht > >ml > > I know the guidelines very well! It was only to shift it to the people who > must deal with the consequences of this issue. > And if you want play this odd guideline game, then you must admit, we don´t > want discuss the same topics again and again! (There are a lot more ... ) > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2007-July/msg00086.html > > I want to stop this, because there was enough confusion in the past. And there > are clear guidelines that we are not RedHat - and we don´t want. > > i will quote GregdeKoenigsberg: > > "The Fedora brand must evolve separately from Red Hat's brand. Fedora is very > important to Red Hat, but Fedora is not Red Hat. It's really crucial to > understand that distinction." > > so -1 again. +1 to Joerg, and -1 to co-branding. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlugAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part-- Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list Fedora-ambassadors-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list
--- End Message ---
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
