On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > http://lwn.net/Articles/83360/ That's ancient history at this point. History we'd of course rather not have to look back on, but we do. As of now, I think that Fedora is the most transparent commercially backed distribution out there. > This is pretty much the most accurate depiction of how the great brand > gulf between Fedora and Red Hat started. And in many people's minds, that > gulf has grown to such an extent that many don't have any way of > associating Red Hat with Fedora *at all*. Yep, sad but true. > > So let me ask you: > > If, in splash screens for Fedora, we put a tasteful "sponsored by Red Hat" > with the Shadowman logo somewhere small... how would you all feel about > that? Go for it! Maybe we can attempt to repair some of the past "damage" to the brand. I help in correcting lots of people's perceptions that things are still how they were in the past. Now the question is: Is rh_legal OK with this? :) -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
