Re: Co-branding?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



JoergSimon wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2008 09:55:34 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
JoergSimon wrote:
Hi Rahul,

just in private and in peace!
Why starting this as a public discussion, this is strange?
I don't see what is wrong with a public discussion.

OK as you wish, marketing list is the wrong place - and a lot of Ambassadors did not read the marketing list

Branding is more concerned with marketing. Besides if ambassadors are not subscribed to the marketing list, they are not following the recommend procedure at

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/Join

Since a RFE to merge the lists was turned down after a majority vote supporting it last time, we can now deal with the fall out. We don't want to cross post either. Refer

http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2007-March/msg00007.html

And yes, RedHat does major work and give much money - but Fedora would not exist in the way as it is, because of the work and the commitment of all the free contributors and i know and i feel, i dont want it marked as a RedHat SubProject. This is wrong!

Absolutely. Marketing as a sub project would definitely be wrong but co-branding means an alliance including sponsorships. Sounds a good fit to me. Refer

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co-branding

Rahul

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux