On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 11:20 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Rahul Sundaram > <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Which descriptions don't make sense either in the summary or after > > reading the specification. I think these are fairly good descriptions > > considering they are essentially developer specifications. > > > How about this as a compromise.... > What if we leave the feature process development driven.. but we hook > in a way for someone who is perusing the feature summaries to easily > drop a comment or a note if they want a layperson explanation. The > notes would go to a marketing group..maybe even this list...an answer > is formulated and sent back to the person who asked the the > explanation and additionally linked in to the feature summary on the > feature list without disturbing the development oriented information > there. > > This might even be useful in figuring out where the next developer > interview opportunities are. +1 ... sort of like a press inquiries address, but offered as part of an already useful document? That way we are asking for targeted questions and not inviting wide-open requests that are mainly covered in the features pages. We could also find a way to cross-tie the SSS with specific features, so one has a press-friendly approach and there is a reciprocating link to find the deeper developer-oriented content. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
