Elio Tondo said the following on 02/06/2008 06:45 AM Pacific Time:
Mike McGrath wrote:
I think that these response times can be discouraging for users
trying to get
information about Fedora, and any effort aimed to understand and fix the
problem will enhance Fedora visibility. BTW, I just tried the Ubuntu
site (I
don't like Ubuntu and it's a long time since my last visit there) and
I found
it lightning fast. I think that Fedora deserves more infrastructure
power to
avoid being considered a poorly performing distro.
The wiki shouldn't be used to get information to end users. Use the
fedoraproject.org/ (no /wiki) or docs if you have something to say to end
users. Our site is also lightning fast, just not Moin.
Ok, I'm now on http://fedoraproject.org/ . I see nine links. Four of
them (Wiki, Communicate, Events on the left menu, and Learn more in the
middle of the page, go to Wiki. The annoncement of F9 Alpha posted on
http://www.press.redhat.com/2008/02/05/help-shape-fedora-9-alpha-release-now-available/
is also on the Wiki. Is this enough to say that, if the Wiki is slow,
there is a significant impact on the user experience?
Elio
+100
Yes, this is screaming for a CMS (content management system)--something
more evolved than a wiki or static html pages. Switching to something
of this nature, for example Plone, has been discussed for a long time,
but to my knowledge we haven't had enough resources and people to lead
it in order to make it happen.
John
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
