On 14/01/2008, Paul Stauffer <paulds@xxxxxx> wrote: > Perhaps it would be a good idea for one of the list admins (Max? Thomas?) to > do a quick diff of the membership lists of these two lists and see if there > is as much of an intersection as we're assuming. If it turns out that f-a-l > membership is primarily just a subset of f-m-l membership, then the question > is really just whether the ambassadors want to continue to have a separate > list or not. And conversely, if the intersection is smaller than we're > assuming, then that might imply that a merger is unwarranted. > > Being on both lists myself, and recognizing the close interaction of the > work of both groups, and thus the extremely heavy cross-posting between the > two lists, I myself would be happy for a merger, just to cut down the number > of duplicate messages in my inbox. But, y'know, I can deal either way. :) Back in March, Karsten Wade touched on this issue[1] already what's considered OffTopic[2]. [1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ambassadors-list/2007-March/msg00011.html [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PostIsOffTopic#fedora-ambassadors-list Basically, fedora-ambassadors-list is for discussions amongst Ambassadors about event coordination and other tactical or project business needs. Other discussions should take place in fedora-marketing-list. Regards, -- Thomas Chung http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasChung -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
