On Dec 20, 2007 4:12 PM, Marc Wiriadisastra <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 16:06 +0300, Zhukov Pavel wrote: > > On Dec 20, 2007 3:20 PM, Marc Wiriadisastra <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Interesting post about whether Fedora is more popular for dev's than > > > Ubuntu. > > > > > > http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/12/18/fedora-more-successful-developer-wise-than-ubuntu > > > > > > I personally don't think it's a fair comparison because Ubuntu is > > > derived from Debian and there is cross over. What I would like to see > > > is a comparison with Debian and Fedora to see what the actual numbers > > > are. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > -- > > > Fedora-marketing-list mailing list > > > Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list > > > > > Fedora project managed by RH. It means strict roadmap, defined > > chekpoints, clear release cycle. > > Debian on the other hand, fully community driven. no checkpoints, no > > erelease cycle, no "head": Debian Project Leader have very limited > > premissions. > > > > I disagree while Fedora project is sponsored by RH the majority of the > contributors are from the community. Max blogged about this the other > day if I remember correctly. > > I'm not to sure what the definition of a community project is but I > would have thought more than 50% constitutes a community project? > > My point related mainly to developer-wise which translates to packagers > and docs I think. > > > Cheers, > > Marc > > -- > Fedora-marketing-list mailing list > Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list > by "Community driven" i mean that roadmap and other major decisions defined by community using voting or other procedures. -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
