Op zaterdag 10-11-2007 om 09:00 uur [tijdzone +0900], schreef Marc Wiriadisastra: > "Fedora 8 came out today and quite frankly, it sucks. I’m a Fedora user > and I run Fedora on about 10 servers right now, including this one that > hosts Dvorak Uncensored. But even though I’m a fan I think that it’s > time to end the intellectual welfare that all the Linux reviewers give > it and raise the bar to the same standards that commercial software is > judged by. What is that standard you ask? It’s the standard of “does it > work”. My conclusion - no - it doesn’t. Fedora 8 is broken." > > It seems like a rant more than anything from my point of view. Some > valid points but overall a rant. > > http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=14453 > > http://www.digg.com/linux_unix/Dvorak_Uncensored_Fedora_8_Sucks > > Cheers > > Marc > Parts of the 'review' are not very credible: "Being an expert, I (...) (...) Since I had a 1280×1024 screen, I wanted to see it in the resolution that the screen supports. So I ran the display configuration and set the Monitor to Samsung 712n which was on their list. (...) After selecting the correct monitor, I returned to select the resolution and even though I had selected a 1280×1024 monitor I still couldn’t (...) I could have started trying to edit the /etc/X11/xorg.conf file but decided f*ck it. Why should I spend several more hours on Fedora 8 just trying to get it to work with a standard size screen? I have better things to do. (...) " Excuse me, is editing xorg.conf "several more hours" of work, and for an "expert" at that? -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
