Re: [Fwd: Re: Get Fedora]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike McGrath wrote:
> Please vote on this:
>
> options are:
>
> Both
>
> Just gnome
>
> You've got till wed.  :)
>
>    -Mike
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: Get Fedora
> From:
> Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:
> Mon, 29 Oct 2007 06:40:46 +0530
> To:
> Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> To:
> Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC:
> "For maintainers and developers of all formal Fedora websites."
> <fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Mike McGrath wrote:
>
>> I'd actually argue thats a marketing decision (whether or not KDE is
>> linked on the get fedora page or not) 
>
> Yes it is. So if I had to make the marketing decision, I would agree
> that GNOME and KDE should be both highlighted there. Also if only
> official spins can be mirrored, they both must be considered official
> spins.
>
> Rahul
both

regards,
amit.
begin:vcard
fn:Amitakhya Phukan
n:Phukan;Amitakhya
adr:;;;;;;India
email;internet:aphukan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
tel;cell:+91-94219-78764
url:http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AmitakhyaPhukan
version:2.1
end:vcard

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux