2007/8/21, Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>: > Furthermore, some security aspects aren't merely "Point'n Click." As > someone who has done policies & procedures for banks, forcing people to > use a process is not optional, and I don't know how many times I caught > key people giving out or assuming authentications were actual, when they > were not. Hey, I'm absolutely not sugesting to modify security policy, I hope you have understood it. I'm talking about an *altervative* method to generate PGP/SSH keys and sign files in a way they can be recognized by Fedora Account System engine. Because, today, there no one information about using a GUI to generate PGP/SSH keys. > I'm not seeing your point there. My apologies if I'm assuming here. I said if you think that command line is better you can't say to others they can't use a GUI, as well as anyone who think that using a GUI is better can't say to others they can't use command line. > There is a reason why there is _always_ a "command line interface" (CLI) > to every program, it's the "most common denominator." Yes, I know it. I use CLI every day, every time because at most cases giving commands allows me to do tasks in a faster way than using GUI's. But this is not the issue. > Graphical user > interfaces (GUI) should never cross CLI interfaces, _only_ complement. Yes, it's right. I never said Fedora need to avoid using CLI interfaces on its CLA process. Again, this is not the issue. Regards, Davidson -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
