Re: Contributors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rahul Sundaram escribió:
Gian Paolo Mureddu wrote:


Couldn't agree more... Fedora seems to have too much "bureaucracy" for contributors to, well, contribute. Some might say that it is standard bureaucracy, but still quite cumbersome at times. Not that it is difficult, just messy and cumbersome at times. I know that the "others are not so bureaucratic" argument means nothing, at least to the many Fedora contributors and community members, but I've seen my share of complaints from "would be" contributors about just that.

So let's talk about that. In a different thread with more details but let's talk about that.

Rahuk

Sorry to answer so late...

First of all, the most common issue among many packagers and would be contributors is the amount of "requisites". I don't fully understand the complaint as, yes, there are a number of requisites, but then again, each distro has theirs. Another common issue seems to be the CLA, some really see it as an evil requirement... like they'd be renouncing the right to claim something their own (I certainly don't understand it that way, but it could easily be misinterpreted in that way).

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux