Rahul Sundaram escribió:
Gian Paolo Mureddu wrote:
Couldn't agree more... Fedora seems to have too much "bureaucracy"
for contributors to, well, contribute. Some might say that it is
standard bureaucracy, but still quite cumbersome at times. Not that
it is difficult, just messy and cumbersome at times. I know that the
"others are not so bureaucratic" argument means nothing, at least to
the many Fedora contributors and community members, but I've seen my
share of complaints from "would be" contributors about just that.
So let's talk about that. In a different thread with more details but
let's talk about that.
Rahuk
Sorry to answer so late...
First of all, the most common issue among many packagers and would be
contributors is the amount of "requisites". I don't fully understand the
complaint as, yes, there are a number of requisites, but then again,
each distro has theirs. Another common issue seems to be the CLA, some
really see it as an evil requirement... like they'd be renouncing the
right to claim something their own (I certainly don't understand it that
way, but it could easily be misinterpreted in that way).
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
